As an outcome of the initial screening process, Alternatives 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, and 1E were retained for study and public opinion.
Through several internal meetings, a number of highway improvement (build) alternatives were conceptualized and presented for consideration by the sponsoring agencies. Again, as with Phase I, each of the proposed highway improvement alternatives generally follow the existing alignment and the proposed typical section. Through more detailed study, completion of several additional internal meetings, and based on feedback received at the first round of open house meetings, the Phase I Alternatives were refined and based on a screening process, the alternatives reduced to Alternatives 2A, 2B, and 2D for further consideration by the sponsoring agencies and the public. Again, as with Phase II, each of the proposed highway improvement alternatives generally follow the existing alignment and the proposed typical section. Phase II Alternatives – Refined (December 2018)īased on feedback received at the second round of open house meetings, the Phase II alternatives were refined and based on a screening process, the alternatives reduced to Alternatives 2B, and 2D for further consideration by the sponsoring agencies and the public.
Given the size and complexity of the overall project, PennDOT will be advancing three (3) construction sections as reflected in the Project Sections graphic. Approved Concept 2D – Final Design (February 2023)Īs reflected in the approved FONSI (2020) and as presented at the Public Hearing (2019), PennDOT will be advancing Concept 2D – Final Design through the final design development process. Multiple build alternatives (plus the No-Build and TSM alternatives) were developed for the project corridor in order to evaluate the effectiveness of each to meet the project needs. Conversely, enabling a built-in web server allows remote access to PeakHour’s stats.The purpose of the reconstruction project is to address the project needs and to improve overall roadway safety, access, and operations by providing geometry meeting current design criteria including adequate shoulders and improved ramp access (including acceleration/ deceleration lengths, ramp auxiliary lanes) throughout the project area.
#Alternative to peakhour software
(Technically, it configures SNMP software in macOS.) If those Macs running the extra package are logged into the same iCloud account, PeakHour discovers them automatically and suggests adding them.
#Alternative to peakhour install
If you like, you can install free additional software from PeakHour on other Macs on the network so that they act like network broadcasters within the network, too, and you can monitor their data usage and network response. PeakHour scoffs at the difficulty and lets me pull internet responsiveness stats via this two-deep ISP router as well as from my local network. My network has a dreaded “double NAT” in which my ISP provides one router into which I’ve plugged a second one: the ISP router doesn’t offer all the features I need but has unique firmware support for the fiber network I’m on that most routers lack. PeakHour supports more esoteric configurations, too. PeakHour’s drop-down charts reveal the current and historical state of devices on your network along with other monitoring data.
0 kommentar(er)
